






 |








 |
Cities
The Intercultural City has sought test its hypothesis on intercultural
innovation through empirical research in cities around the world.
Each study has been piece of action research, intended to both contribute
new knowledge to the project as a whole and to offer practical policy-making
guidance at the local level. Each has been developed in partnership
with local agencies, around themes which have local resonance. Consequently,
each programme of research is based both on a set of questions which
are generic to the Project as a whole, and a second set which are
specific to the local conditions.
The following case studies have been completed:
UNITED KINGDOM
- BRISTOL
- NEWCASTLE/TYNE
AND WEAR
- LONDON
BOROUGH OF LEWISHAM
- LONDON
BOROUGH OF TOWER HAMLETS
NORWAY
- OSLO
- DRAMMEN
NEW ZEALAND
- AUCKLAND
AUSTRALIA
- LOGAN
(BRISBANE)
| CITY |
Newcastle/Tyne and Wear |
| CLIENT |
Tyne and Wear City Region; One North East |
| PARTNERS |
University of Newcastle upon Tyne; The Architecture Centre
Network |
| THEME |
Enhancing the competitiveness of the city-region through the
attraction and retention of migrants |
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
- How can the city become more attractive to skilled migrants?
- How can it ensure more migrants stay in the city?
- Would special measures or waivers of UK immigration regulations
for the city region be feasible and beneficial?
- How can architecture, design and urban animation contribute
to a more cosmopolitan and migrant-friendly atmosphere?
- To what extent do local intercultural agents and networks
have the capacity and the supporting milieu to play an influential
role in the process of change?
|
| OUTCOMES |
A final report can be downloaded at. It includes:
- a review of managed and regionalised migration strategies
in the UK, Australia, Canada;
- a new model for gauging city attractivity
- a review of intercultural city architecture and urban
design;
- a study of the impact of higher education on migration;
and·
- interviews with migrants.
Download the report: The
Attraction and Retention of Migrants to the Tyne and Wear
City Region |
| BACKGROUND |
The Tyne and Wear city/region has undergone a long period
of deindustrialisation and its population is projected to fall
over the next decade. By UK standards the city has traditionally
received very low numbers of overseas migrants but this has
been changing in recent years through regional dispersal of
refugees and asylum seekers, overseas workers and international
students to the region’s universities. This has been paralleled
by determined efforts to make the city less peripheral through
major investment in cultural, science and economic development
initiatives. However, levels of entrepreneurship and innovation
in the indigenous population remain very low and the city believes
it needs to import fresh talent if it is not to fall further
behind growth in the South-East of England. Two questions arise:
can the city sustain levels of economic growth which will be
the ultimate determinant of its attractiveness? And can the
local population adapt positively to the change in demographics
and culture that high level migration will entail? |
| CONTACT |
Phil Wood philwood@comedia.org.uk
|
| CITY |
Bristol City Council |
| CLIENT |
Bristol Cultural Development Partnership |
| PARTNERS |
Arts & Business, Arts Council England, South
West, Bristol City Council |
| THEME |
How open is Bristol?
|
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
- An analysis of 30 well known people each from the past
and present who came from the outside to Bristol and an
assessment of how receptive the city was to them in achieving
their aims
- An additional group of 30 potential young achievers will
be identified. How well is Bristol doing today in helping
these people fulfil their ambitions?
- How open is the institutional structure in the city, the
business community, civil society and is the physical urban
setting conducive to intercultural exchange.
- What initiatives exist that show that Bristol is an open
city?
- Is the city open to other regional partners in fulfilling
its goals to be a competitive city?
|
| OUTCOMES |
A final report has been produced and is available
for download.
Download the report: How
open is Bristol? |
| BACKGROUND |
As a port city Bristol has, over centuries, received
and welcomed outsiders. Today Bristol continues to receive substantial
inward migration – people who are attracted to its physical
setting, its new industries in finance and the creative sector,
and those who remain after university. Yet there appears to
be a less open and exclusive side to Bristol too. Is this affecting
Bristol’s capacity to compete at a European scale? For
example the creative industries rely on people who move between
sectors, fuse ideas, generate crossovers between disciplines
and connect. Openness is a key to the sector’s success. |
| CONTACT |
Charles Landry charleslandry@comedia.org.uk
|

| CITY |
London Borough of Tower Hamlets |
| CLIENT |
The Borough Council |
| PARTNERS |
|
| THEME |
Community engagement and the intercultural city. |
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
This study provides a practical engagement with the statutory
planning consultation process of Tower Hamlets. It commends
the Borough for extending its consultation and engagement process
beyond legal necessity to position BME communities at the centre
of its Local Development Framework, and it highlights instances
of innovative practice that can be further developed in the
future and have a practical application in other contexts. However,
the report also introduces opportunities for advancing consultation
in Tower Hamlets (and elsewhere) towards a level that is genuinely
intercultural. Crucial is the adoption of consultation and engagement
as a permanent set of processes, underpinning the corporate
approach of the local authority. Planning forms just one small
part of wider processes of engagement and thus intercultural
planning requires an intercultural approach across the whole
local authority. |
| OUTCOMES |
A final report has been produced and is available for download.
Download the report: London
Borough of Tower Hamlets: Intercultural Consultation for a
Global City District |
| BACKGROUND |
In Tower Hamlets, a Borough awarded Beacon Status in the
'Community Cohesion', 'Getting Closer to Community' and 'Promoting
Racial Equality' categories (1); and a Borough that recognizes
in its Regeneration Strategy that diversity is the
major asset for economic comparative advantage as a 'Global
City District'; genuine efforts are being made to build levels
of engagement and partnership that embrace the complexity
of the resident population. This is evident through efforts
to improve community cohesion (such as through a recruitment
strategies to develop a workforce that reflects the profile
of local communities), to advance inter-faith understanding
(such as through the promotion of an Inter-Faith Network),
and to raise academic achievement for Black Minority Ethnic
(BME) puplis. Crucially, it is also evident through efforts
to plan towards a Tower Hamlets of the future that reflects
the aspirations and potential of a resident population that
is increasingly diverse and a diversity that is increasingly
complex.
(1) It also has Beacon Status for the 'Supporting Social
Care Workers 2004-2005' category. |
| CONTACT |
Tom Fleming
tom@tfconsultancy.co.uk
|
| CITY |
Oslo, Norway |
| CLIENT |
Oslo kommune (county/municipality of Oslo) |
| PARTNERS |
Norconsult
The Work Research Institute |
| THEME |
Critical success-factors for the contribution
of the ethnic diversity to economic development and the creation
of value |
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
- How can the city benefit from the ethnic diversity?
- In what (economic) fields is there intercultural innovation
today?
- To what extent do local intercultural agents and networks
have the capacity and the supporting milieu to play an influential
role in the process of change?
- How can an ethnically diverse partnership be established
to ensure a sound and stable development process?
|
| OUTCOMES |
- Input to the government white paper on development of
the capital.
- Mobilisation of change agents and networks in support
of the OXLO-project (Oslo Extra Large-project)
- International presentation of Oslo as an intercultural
city
- 4 interim reports and a final report
Download the English or the Norwegian versions of the final
report here:
English version
Norwegian version
|
| BACKGROUND |
Oslo, the capital of Norway has become a multiethnic
city. Today the immigrants constitute about 18% of the population.
This change has come rapidly, in only the last 10 years. The
city does not yet see itself as multicultural. Immigrants, mainly
refugees and asylum seekers, have so far been associated with
problems, and indeed there are problems – with language,
with recognition of formal skills and expertise, with unemployment,
with health and trauma to mention some of the most salient.
However, the orientation toward problems has concealed the potentials
and possibilities of ethnic diversity for economic development,
innovation and value creation. The project aims to identify
and point out what these potentials and possibilities may be,
(for example in terms of new products and services, new companies/workplaces,
and new organisational models), and means to utilise them further.
|
| CONTACT |
Benedicte Brøgger, The Work Research
Institute
benedicte.broegger@afi-wri.no
|

| CITY |
Drammen, Norway |
| CLIENT |
Drammen commune (Municipality) |
| PARTNERS |
Immigration Directorate (UDI) Oslo commune,
Høgskolen I Buskerud Regional College |
| THEME |
Ethnic diversity and entrepreneurship |
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
- Develop a better understanding of the social, economic
and cultural capital of immigrants
- To view the situation in Drammen in relation to relevant
international research
- To examine how the immigrants’ potential for innovation
and entrepreneurship may be developed and brought to use
in the community.
|
| OUTCOMES |
The work process is divided into four stages:
- Statistical review and literature review.
- Field work: interviews with immigrant organizations, businesses
and other key personnel from the immigrant community as
well as Norwegian organizations representing the business
community, trades unions and the public sector.
- Evaluation of findings in relation to a review of policy
- A dialogue conference centered on a structured exchange
between representatives of the immigrant communities.
A report will be produced on completion of each stage. And
a summary report will be produced by the end of the whole
process.
Download the English or the Norwegian versions of the final
report here:
English version
Norwegian version
|
| BACKGROUND |
Drammen has had a rapidly increasing immigrant
population over the last ten years. The immigrant population
is now approaching 20% and the local authority is in the process
of developing a complex policy and planning framework to accommodate
this process. Central themes will be focused on employment,
business development and culture. The report will contribute
to this policy. |
| CONTACT |
Benedicte Brøgger, The Work Research Institute
benedicte.broegger@afi-wri.no
|
| CITY |
Lewisham, south-east
London |
| CLIENT |
London Borough of Lewisham |
| PARTNERS |
DEGW Strategic Design |
| THEME |
Re-thinking Area and Local Master-planning in
an Intercultural Setting |
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
- How local development studies and master planning techniques
can be enhanced and developed in order to better meet the
needs of an increasingly diverse community?
- How can Lewisham develop a new intercultural sense of
place in which a greater understanding of under-engaged
or disengaged people will provide revealing and practical
narratives that will assist future processes of consultation
and planning?
- How to resource and construct multi disciplinary teams?
- How can planners widen the data sources and evidence-base
upon which they create planning and development briefs and,
subsequently, policies?
- Rethinking consultation strategies and techniques: exploring
how new partnerships and intermediaries can improve understanding
of communities; building on existing political consultation
structures and methodology.
|
| OUTCOMES |
The project will help Lewisham to produce
a new framework, or template, for area master-planning, exploring
new ways in which public agencies and partners (non-planners)
can contribute more fully to the master-planning policies.
New strategies for community consultation will help planners
in Lewisham understand how they can widen, and deepen, their
understanding of BME communities and how these communities
see and experience physical and public space. The project
will concentrate on the local communities of Deptford and
Lewisham, both areas in which the Council wishes to re-visit
existing master-plans over the next couple of years. While
making a significant contribution to both Deptford and Catford
master-planning, the programme aims to develop techniques
and strategies that will be applicable to other areas of Lewisham.The
project will also have explored how new partnerships with
intermediary community organisations can help deepen consultation
and to develop a dialogue which supplements that gained through
the ‘usual suspect’ or community leaders. A final
report and conference will aim to disseminate the learning
of the project to a wider local government and public sector
audience.
Download the Interim Report: Knowing
Lewisham |
| BACKGROUND |
Lewisham is a dynamic and diverse London Borough,
made up of a number of discreet urban centres or ‘villages’.
Over the next decade it will see unparalleled levels of inward
investment whilst its population, in common with much of inner
London, will continue to diversify. A major challenge for Lewisham
is the way in which it can create plan to both take advantage
of new investment and also to ensure greater security and prosperity
within its increasingly diverse local communities. The Borough
is also aware of the challenges faced by political leaders and
planners in ensuring that there increasing opportunities for
intercultural collaboration and understanding. |
| CONTACT |
Richard Brecknock
richard@brecknockconsulting.com.au |
| CITY |
Auckland, New Zealand |
| CLIENT |
Auckland City Council (www.akcity.govt.nz) |
| PARTNERS |
|
| THEME |
The aim is to better understand how an intercultural
approach contributes to economic, cultural, and social wellbeing.
In economic terms this is about how it contributes to innovation,
creativity and entrepreneurship. In social and cultural terms
it relates to the conditions that will encourage intercultural
networks and enable benefits of intermixing between cultures
to be realised.And how an intercultural approach can sit alongside
the bicultural – that is, the relationship between biculturalism
and interculturalism. |
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
- How open is Auckland as a city to people of diverse backgrounds?
- To what extent does intercultural mixing assist (or not)
in developing a sense of belonging in Auckland by ethnic
migrants?
- What is the impact of Auckland/NZ’s bicultural context
on the promise (potential benefits) of interculturalism?
- Who are the intercultural agents in the Auckland ethnic
groups?· What is the role of the education sector
as an intercultural enabler?
- To what extent is intercultural networking occurring in
the creative industries and education sectors? What conditions
would encourage more of this? What is the potential for
innovation and building a unique Auckland/NZ niche in international
markets?
|
| OUTCOMES |
The outcomes include to:
- Understand how council can engage equally with all ethnic
groups
- Understand what conditions, circumstances, environments
enable better communication & working between cultures
- Understand how an intercultural approach to diversity
can contribute to innovation, creativity and entrepreneurship
- Understand of how council can encourage and support intercultural
networks (policy, planning, operations)
Download the report: Auckland
Case Study |
| BACKGROUND |
Auckland is New Zealand’s largest city
with a population of around 400,000 and is located on the north
island. The city has an interesting and growing diversity with
181 identified ethnic groupings. This multicultural population
includes strong communities from the Pacific Islands, India
and Asian countries such as China and Korea.
Of great significance in New Zealand is the bicultural relationship
between the Maori and the Pakeha [NZ Europeans]. The bicultural
relationship is underpinned by the Treaty of Waitangi, signed
by the Maori and British Crown in 1840. Under the Treaty there
is an obligation to protect Maori rights and the principle of
mutual benefit and mutual advantage is the cornerstone of the
partnership.
Auckland City is New Zealand’s major commercial centre
and the city has a significant secondary and tertiary education
sector in the CBD that attracts large numbers of students from
Asian countries. |
| CONTACT |
Richard Brecknock richard@brecknockconsulting.com.au |
| CITY |
Logan, Queensland,
Australia |
| CLIENT |
Logan City Council |
| THEME |
Unlike many Australian cities there has been
limited clustering of cultural and linguistic communities in
Logan. Therefore the major focus of the Logan Intercultural
Study is on the spatial, social and economic dynamics of settlement
and population distribution across the suburbs of Logan and
what does this mean for Council’s planning and policies. |
| MAIN QUESTIONS |
- Is Logan an open and welcoming society?
- What are the conditions that have encouraged migrants
to settle throughout Logan rather than gather in geographic/cultural
clusters?
- Does the built form and dispersed nature of Logan meet
the cultural needs of the people?
- What groups/activities/circumstances/environments enable
intercultural mixing and networks to develop?
- Does involvement in the education sector lead to increased
intercultural understanding and networking?
- Who are the intercultural agents in the Logan ethnic groups?
- To what extent might ethnic groups engage across sectors
through business and the creative industries?
- To what extent does intercultural mixing rather than clustering
assist or hinder developing a sense of belonging in Logan
by ethnic migrants?
|
| OUTCOMES |
- Define conditions/agents/circumstances/activities that
would encourage or enhance intercultural mixing in Logan
- Identify benefits that could be realised from intercultural
mixing in the Logan context
- How could the public sector benefit from building in intercultural
approaches in:
- Policy making
- Facility development
- Facility management
- Design of the public realm (parks, streets, artwork
etc)
- Advocacy
- Contribute to understanding of how Council can engage
equally with all ethnic groups
- Better understanding of what conditions/circumstances/environments
enable better communication and working between cultures
- Contribute to an understanding of how Council can encourage
and support intercultural networks (policy, planning, operations)
Download report: Logan
Case Study |
| BACKGROUND |
Logan is a south east Queensland city and home
to more than 170,000 people from more than 160 different cultures.
It celebrates its diversity and the rich and varied lifestyle
it offers. Logan is also a very young city with more than 50
per cent of residents aged 30 or younger. Logan City has always
been a place attractive to migrating families, from the early
days of pioneering settlers from the British Isles and Germany
to the ongoing influx today of refugees and migrants from the
Middle East, Africa, Asia and the Pacific Islands. |
| CONTACT |
Richard Brecknock richard@brecknockconsulting.com.au |

|
|